|
While America Aged: How Pension Debts Ruined General Motors, Stopped the NYC Subways, Bankrupted San Diego, and Loom as the Next Financial Crisis | 
| Author: Roger Lowenstein
Publisher: Penguin Press HC, The
Category: Book
List Price: $25.95
Buy New: $17.13
You Save: $8.82 (34%)
Rating:  20 reviews
Sales Rank: 6294
Media: Hardcover
Number Of Items: 1
Pages: 288
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.1
Dimensions (in): 9.3 x 6.1 x 1.1
ISBN: 1594201676
Dewey Decimal Number: 331.25240973
EAN: 9781594201677
Publication Date: May 1, 2008
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
From the bestselling author of Buffett, When Genius Failed, and Origins of the Crash, a wake-up call to the pension and retirement crisis facing America and the road map for a way out
In While America Aged, bestselling author Roger Lowenstein explains how corporations and governments ran up ruinous pension and health-care promises to workerspromises that are now coming due and that will hit America like a tsunami if nothing is done.
Negotiating high benefits means gambling with future financesand when the farm gets sold out from underneath major corporations or public institutions, it affects all of us, and in ways we might not imagine. With his trademark narrative panache, Lowenstein unravels the truth about how pensions work in America and illuminates the impending crisis. While America Aged is comprised of three fascinating case studies each an object lesson and a compelling historical saga. The first goes back to the early days of the United Auto Workers and its crusading leader, Walter Reuther, to tell the story of how pensions and health-care obligations destroyed the American auto industry, in particular General Motors.
Lowenstein then shifts the scene to New York City to tell the story of the rise of public pensions and public sector unions through the vehicle of the Communist-led Transport Workers Union. Once again, justifiable benefits were followed by outrageous ones, such as the right to retire at age fifty. The saga reached a dramatic climax in 2005, when workers responded to proposed pension cutbacks with a massive strike that brought New Yorks subways and buses to a screeching halt days before Christmas.
In the concluding episode, Lowenstein visits a metropolis even more reckless in doling out benefitsSan Diego. Desperate not to impose higher taxes, city officials in this highly conservative enclave cut a series of deals with unions to short-change the retirement system and use pension funds to run the city. A massive scandal ensuedtwo mayors resigned, officials were indicted, and San Diego lost its bond rating. Lowenstein warns that the pension wars that erupted in Detroit, New York City, and San Diego are only the first. But he also recognizes that workers are entitled to decent security in their retirementa critical problem as the country ages. While America Aged explains how we came to this crisis, and it also proposes a way out. Arming readers with knowledge of the consequences of doing nothing, While America Aged, first and foremost, a call to action.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 15 more reviews...
Good book, comically poor timing for Roger December 20, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Roger writes well. His biographies and histories are great (buffett, when genius failed). But he is oh-for-two in forecasting events (origins of the crash, while america aged). The first was released in 2004 just as markets began a roaring comeback that went even higher than the heights of the 2000 peak. The "crash" he speaks of has zero mentions of real estate, and seems to be just talking about internet stocks and enron. These micro-crashes turned out to be small compared to what was coming.
Similarly, the prediction in the subtitle of pensions as the next great financial crisis now sounds a bit silly in the context of what is going on. It is a great book, but again the timing turned out poor.
He seemed to miss the far more important dynamic in between these books. The real crash, and the real crisis, eluded him.
Thats OK though - he is an author, not a fortune-teller. But I wish he would get out of the business of predictions.
 Seriously needs graphics to be taken seriously December 6, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
The author and the publisher both, by inclination, yield a product that resembles: word word word number word number [more words] number and number word word... ad infinitum.
The book has NO tables, charts, graphs, summaries (Have I made my point clear?!) or even chapter subheadings. Dealing with the text is like working on a factory production line, instead of surveying the factory, which is the sense that a better-produced work can give you.
If that format suits you, fine.
If not, for instance, if you would like to give the book an hour's skim instead of -- well, depends on how fast you deal with the WORD WORD WORD number WORD format -- pass it by. They lose an audience. Big deal. You'd have thought they were still dealing with -- limited by -- hot metal typesetting.
 Why aren't the people on Capital Hill reading this? November 20, 2008
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I really hope that our government officials don't fall for the double-talk from the automobile manufacturers begging for a a handout, with the ongoing financial crises ripping across America.
This book gives you one good reason the government shouldn't bail out GM, or any of the other automakers. The [retired] and working union members of the UAW have nothing to fear (yet) since they're the ones sucking these companies dry with their greed, laziness and apathy for the dire economic events happening as I comment on this book.
Get rid of the Unions! They are one of the biggest reasons for the downhill economic slide our country is taking.
 informative or persuasive? depends on your perspective November 15, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
A book like this is meant to be informative and persuasive. The problem is that there really isn't a clear demarcation line between the two ideas. It seems to rely a great deal on the predisposition of the reader himself. I suppose that to a greater or lesser extent this is true with all writing, what makes this book so obvious in it's informative-persuasive spectrum is that i don't agree with the author's basic ideas and i find things like his choice of words irritating and as a result wonder outloud not "is he right?", but "what is he hiding from me?".
It's a curious phenomena that i'd like to take a minute to think about and to try to explain. The author is very conservative, both politically and socially. this shows up in things like name calling and a dismissive attitude towards ideas like socialism or state intervention in the marketplace. For instance, the radical labor unions are so obviously wrong that their ideas aren't worth taking seriously, even for a moment, the only thing to do is see how they used power historically and block their influence in the future.
I can see things like word choice, name calling, dismissive attitude. What i can not see, without repeating what is a considerable amount of research that the author has brought to the book, is the choice of ideas. Intellectual battles are fought (the book details their outward appearan ces), and the streams of thoughtfulness that lead up to them (this is where the book falls completely flat, in the explanations in ideology that drives the people). All i can see is what the author thought valuable and of enough worth to mention, and i know he is blind to the value of anything left of center (so to speak). So what happens is that his reporting seems to boil down to a blow by blow power struggle like a boxing match, not a waltz of competing ideas (which is what i envision history to be).
Is his major idea worthwhile? are pension demands bankrupting companies and cities? probably. but i already thought that before i got the book, which is why i invested the time to read it. My interest was in finding out why and how, what competing ideas won out, and which lost. None of which i really learned from the book. what i learned what that a very conservative person looks at the world in a very specific way, a rather unnuanced way that really misses what i think are really big issues.
Friendly advice for progressives November 10, 2008
2 out of 3 found this review helpful
For progressives who know nothing about the author, they might take the three descriptions of pension debacles in this book as an indictment of things the left generally supports such as strong unions and pensions for workers. However, if one examines his solutions at the end of the book, it is clear Lowenstein is center-left and progressives would be wise to heed his advice.
In short, the book describes what happened to retirement systems for employees of General Motors, New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority and the city of San Diego. His exquisite detail shows how time and time again unions piled demand on top of demand and a GM management flush with cash or weak-kneed elected officials agreed to pension enhancements that later hobbled their entities.
At least in GM's case, one could argue that the deals were cut before real problems began to occur and the problem was not so much with the initial agreements as with the inability to alter them once they became unaffordable. In the case of San Diego, the train went off the rails well before the public discovered how bad things had become because elected officials tried to hide the problem while they made decisions that compounded it.
Lowenstein suggests solutions that many progressives would endorse, such as universal health care coverage and stronger regulation and support for pension systems. However, progressives should also heed the message that union demands can become excessive and when they do, they should be resisted.
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 BetterEditor.net
| |
